Russian orhtodox dating Random couples chat free
These Jewish movements have infused into American life a which assaults Western culture as being something deficient, something suspect, something replete with moral turpitude.A prime component of the Jewish movements’ attack on white identity has been the pathologization of Gentile allegiances.removing Christian symbols from public places); facilitating the displacement of native populations via mass migration into Western societies; dual loyalty because of Jewish sympathies with foreign Jews, especially Israel since 1948; and the history of Jews as a hostile elite in the USSR during the period when it became the most murderous regime in European history.Since I believe that these propositions are intellectually defensible, and since these propositions, if believed by non-Jews, would cause them to attempt to lessen Jewish power and thereby further their own interests, it is indeed the case that my work could be said to provide intellectual legitimacy to anti-Jewish attitudes and behavior.It appears from your most recent writings, such as your essay exposing Jewry’s activities against white Americans, “The Utter Normality Of Ethnonationalism—Except For Whites,” that you have moved from being a dispassionate observer to an overt critic of Jewish collective behavior. As I noted, segments of the Jewish community have interests and behavior that conflict with my interests, of which, I am active in promoting.For example, I firmly believe that Jewish neo-conservatives whose primary allegiance is to Israel have had a decisive influence on recent American foreign policy.
This is evidenced by Jewry’s economic domination in many parts of Europe prior to World War II; cultural subversion via the Jewish role in the media and intellectual life (e.g.But this isn’t really any different from claiming that Zionist theories provide intellectual legitimacy to the dispossession of the Palestinians - or that Freudian psychoanalysis provides intellectual legitimacy to anti-Western attitudes.At the end of the day, what counts is whether indeed my writings are intellectually defensible.The only difference between conflicts between Jews and non-Jews compared to garden variety ethnic conflict stems from the fact that for over a century, Jews have formed an elite in various European and European-derived societies with a peculiar profile: deeply ethnocentric; adept at ethnic networking; wealthy and intelligent; aggressive in pursuit of their interests; prone to media ownership and the production of culture; and hostile to the traditional peoples and cultures of the societies in which they form an elite.
Because Jews have wielded immense power as an elite that is vastly disproportionate to their numbers, anti-Jewish attitudes and behavior are to be expected when Jewish power conflicts with the interests of others.Their presence at elite universities and their access to prestigious publication venues, is an important basis of their influence.