Aunties adult chat free sides
We are told there are those in favour of same-sex marriage, and then there are the bigots.But allow me to make the case for traditional marriage as being between one man and one woman, writes Michael Jensen.It is crucial to notice that the proposed revision of marriage laws involves exactly that: a revision of marriage.
This is where Bill Shorten again misunderstands what marriage is.As we now understand it, marriage is not merely the expression of a love people have for each other.It is, or is intended as, a life-long union between two people who exemplify the biological duality of the human race, with the openness to welcoming children into the world.) New Zealand, and we ought to get with the programme.
The Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, in line with the new ALP dogma, has announced that he is introducing a private members bill into Parliament next Monday. I believe we have to change this law which discriminates against adult couples on the basis of who they love. The terms in which the pro-marriage redefinition case are stated make it sound as inevitable as the dawn, and as unstoppable as the tide.
Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice. The revisionist case has not provided a clear and reasonable definition of marriage beyond saying that if two people want to call their relationship by that name, they should be able to by choice.